Optical Coatings — Comprehensive Guide
▸1Introduction to Optical Coatings
1.1What Is an Optical Coating?
An optical coating is one or more thin layers of material deposited onto the surface of an optical component to modify how that surface reflects, transmits, or absorbs light. The individual layers have thicknesses on the order of the wavelength of light — typically tens to hundreds of nanometers — and their optical behavior is governed by interference between the multiple reflections that occur at each layer boundary.
The simplest optical coating is a single dielectric film, such as a quarter-wave layer of magnesium fluoride (MgF₂) applied to glass. More sophisticated designs stack dozens or even hundreds of alternating high- and low-refractive-index layers to achieve performance that would be impossible with bulk materials alone: reflectivities exceeding 99.999%, transmittance windows only a few nanometers wide, or antireflection over a full octave of bandwidth [1, 2].
Optical coatings divide broadly into two families based on their constituent materials. Dielectric coatings use transparent materials — oxides, fluorides, and other insulators — and rely entirely on interference. Metallic coatings use thin metal films (aluminum, silver, gold) and exploit the high intrinsic reflectivity of metals, sometimes enhanced with dielectric overcoats. Many modern designs are hybrids, combining metallic and dielectric layers to achieve performance neither approach achieves alone [1].
1.2Why Coatings Matter
Every uncoated glass–air surface reflects roughly 4% of incident light. In a multi-element optical system this loss compounds rapidly: a 10-element lens assembly with 20 uncoated surfaces transmits only about 44% of the light that enters it. Antireflection coatings reduce that per-surface loss to well below 1%, recovering most of the lost throughput. Beyond transmission efficiency, uncoated reflections create stray light, ghost images, and veiling glare that degrade image contrast [2, 3].
At the other extreme, high-reflector coatings make laser cavities possible. A laser resonator requires mirrors with reflectivities of 99.5% or higher to sustain oscillation at practical gain levels. Metallic mirrors cannot reach this threshold without unacceptable absorption losses; only multilayer dielectric stacks provide the near-unity reflectance that modern lasers demand [1, 4].
Between these endpoints, coatings enable an enormous range of optical functions: beam splitters that divide light by intensity or wavelength, bandpass filters that isolate narrow spectral windows, edge filters that sharply separate spectral regions, and polarizing coatings that split s- and p-polarizations. Modern photonics — from telecommunications to biomedical imaging to gravitational-wave detection — depends on thin-film coatings at nearly every optical surface [1, 5].
▸2Fresnel Reflection and the Need for Coatings
2.1Fresnel Equations at Normal Incidence
When light crosses the boundary between two media with different refractive indices, a fraction of the light is reflected. The Fresnel equations quantify this reflection. At normal incidence (light perpendicular to the surface), the power reflectance is independent of polarization and simplifies to [2, 5]:
Where = power reflectance, = refractive index of the incident medium, and = refractive index of the transmitting medium.
For light traveling from air () into BK7 glass ( at 633 nm), this gives R ≈ 4.2% per surface. The transmittance of a single surface is T = 1 − R (ignoring absorption). For a system of N surfaces, each with the same reflectance, the total system transmittance is [2]:
Problem: A 10-element imaging lens made of BK7 glass has 20 air–glass surfaces. No coatings are applied. Calculate the system transmittance at 633 nm (n = 1.517), ignoring absorption and scattering.
Step 1 — Per-surface reflectance:
Step 2 — System transmittance:
Without coatings, more than half the light is lost to Fresnel reflections alone. Even a simple single-layer AR coating reducing each surface to 1.5% reflection would raise system transmittance to (0.985)²⁰ = 74.0% — a 75% improvement in throughput.
2.2Angle and Polarization Dependence
At oblique incidence, the reflectance depends on both the angle of incidence and the polarization state of the light. The full Fresnel equations give the amplitude reflection coefficients for s-polarization (electric field perpendicular to the plane of incidence) and p-polarization (electric field parallel to the plane of incidence) [2, 5]:
Where = angle of incidence and = angle of refraction from Snell's law: .
The power reflectances are and . At normal incidence both reduce to the simple formula from Section 2.1. As the angle increases, R_s rises monotonically toward unity, while R_p first decreases, reaches zero at Brewster's angle, then rises sharply [2]:
At Brewster's angle, the reflected beam is perfectly s-polarized. For BK7 in air, θ_B ≈ 56.6°. This polarization-dependent behavior has direct consequences for coating design: coatings specified for oblique incidence must account for the splitting between s- and p-reflectance [1, 3].
For the full treatment of Fresnel equations, s- and p-polarization definitions, and polarization management in optical systems, see the Polarization & Polarizers guide.
2.3Multi-Surface Transmission Loss
The practical impact of Fresnel loss is best understood by comparing coated and uncoated systems [2, 3]:
| Surfaces | Uncoated (4.2%) | Single-Layer AR (1.5%) | BBAR (0.5%) | High-Perf AR (0.25%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 91.8% | 97.0% | 99.0% | 99.5% |
| 6 | 77.4% | 91.3% | 97.0% | 98.5% |
| 10 | 65.2% | 86.0% | 95.1% | 97.5% |
| 20 | 42.5% | 73.9% | 90.4% | 95.1% |
| 40 | 18.1% | 54.6% | 81.8% | 90.5% |
The difference between uncoated and BBAR-coated grows dramatically with surface count. A 40-surface system transmits only 18% uncoated but over 81% with broadband AR coatings — the difference between an unusable and a high-performance system.
▸3Thin-Film Interference Theory
3.1Optical Path Difference in Thin Films
The behavior of a thin-film coating is governed by interference between the light waves reflected from the front and rear surfaces of the film. When light at normal incidence strikes a thin film of refractive index n_f and physical thickness d deposited on a substrate of refractive index n_s, two reflected waves are produced: one from the air–film interface and one from the film–substrate interface [1, 2].
The optical path difference between these two reflections is 2 n_f d (the round-trip through the film). An additional phase shift of π (equivalent to half a wavelength) occurs at any interface where light reflects from a higher-index medium. Whether this π shift occurs at one or both interfaces determines whether the net interference is constructive or destructive at a given wavelength [1, 4].
Where = total phase difference (rad), = refractive index of the film, = physical thickness (same units as λ), and = vacuum wavelength. The +π term accounts for the phase shift at the film–substrate interface when n_f < n_s.
Destructive interference of the reflected beams — and therefore minimum reflectance — occurs when δ = (2m + 1)π, where m is a non-negative integer. The simplest case (m = 0) gives the quarter-wave condition [1, 2].
3.2The Quarter-Wave Condition
This is the foundational design rule of thin-film optics: a film whose optical thickness equals one-quarter of the design wavelength produces destructive interference of the reflected waves at that wavelength. The physical thickness is [1]:
For a single-layer AR coating, minimum reflectance at the design wavelength occurs when the film index equals the geometric mean of the surrounding media [1, 4]:
When this condition is met, the amplitudes of the two reflected waves are exactly equal and their destructive interference is complete — reflectance drops to zero at the design wavelength [1].
Problem: Calculate the physical thickness of a single-layer MgF₂ AR coating on BK7 glass, designed for 550 nm. n_MgF₂ = 1.38, n_BK7 = 1.517.
Step 1 — Verify the ideal index:
MgF₂ (n = 1.38) is higher than ideal (1.232), so reflectance will not reach zero.
Step 2 — Physical thickness:
Step 3 — Residual reflectance:
MgF₂ reduces reflectance from 4.2% (uncoated) to 1.28% — a factor of 3.3 improvement — but cannot reach zero because its index (1.38) exceeds the ideal value (1.232). No common low-index material has n ≈ 1.23, which is why broadband multilayer designs are used when lower reflectance is required.
3.3The Transfer Matrix Method
For multilayer coatings, the transfer matrix method provides an exact solution for any number of layers by representing each layer as a 2×2 matrix and multiplying them in sequence [1, 4]:
Where is the phase thickness of layer j (rad) and for s-polarization at normal incidence.
The amplitude reflection coefficient is then [1, 4]:
The power reflectance is R = |r|² and the transmittance is T = 1 − R for lossless media. The transfer matrix method is the computational engine behind all modern thin-film design software [1, 4].
▸4Antireflection (AR) Coatings
4.1Single-Layer AR (Quarter-Wave)
The simplest and most widely used antireflection coating is a single quarter-wave layer. The residual reflectance of a single-layer quarter-wave AR coating at normal incidence is [1, 2]:
Reflectance reaches zero only when . For BK7 glass in air, n_ideal ≈ 1.23. MgF₂ (n ≈ 1.38) is the standard choice — it is mechanically hard, resistant to moisture, and easy to deposit. The resulting reflectance of approximately 1.3% per surface is adequate for many applications [1, 7].
A single-layer AR coating achieves its minimum reflectance at exactly one wavelength. As the wavelength departs from the design point, reflectance increases in a V-shaped curve. For this reason, single-layer AR coatings designed for a specific laser line are called V-coats [1, 7].
| Coating Type | Layers | Typical R_avg | Bandwidth | Common Designation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single-layer MgF₂ | 1 | 1.3% | ~100 nm usable | MgF₂ |
| V-coat | 2–3 | < 0.25% | 10–30 nm | V-coat |
| BBAR (visible) | 4–6 | < 0.5% | 400–700 nm | BBAR-VIS |
| BBAR (NIR) | 4–6 | < 0.5% | 650–1100 nm | BBAR-NIR |
| BBAR (broadband) | 6–10 | < 0.5% | 350–1100 nm | BBAR-B |
| Dual-band | 8–12 | < 0.5% at each band | Two discrete bands | Dual-V or dual-band |
4.2Broadband AR (BBAR)
When low reflectance is needed over a wide wavelength range, a single layer is insufficient. Broadband antireflection (BBAR) coatings use multiple alternating layers of high-index and low-index materials, with thicknesses optimized by numerical methods to minimize reflectance across the target band [1].
A classic two-layer design uses a high-index layer next to the substrate and a low-index layer on top, creating a W-shaped reflectance profile. Four-layer and six-layer BBAR designs extend this principle further, achieving average reflectance below 0.5% over ranges of 300 nm or more. Modern numerical optimization routines can design BBAR coatings with dozens of layers achieving average reflectance below 0.2% across the full visible spectrum [1, 6].
The performance tradeoff is fundamental: the wider the wavelength range, the higher the minimum achievable average reflectance for a given number of layers [1].
4.3Dual-Band and Multi-Band AR
Many laser systems operate at two or more discrete wavelengths simultaneously — for example, 1064 nm and 532 nm (Nd:YAG fundamental and second harmonic). Dual-band AR coatings achieve R < 0.5% at each target wavelength while accepting higher reflectance in the gaps between bands [1, 7].
Multi-band designs for three or more wavelengths push layer counts higher and require increasingly precise thickness control. IBS deposition is often specified for multi-band AR coatings because the tight tolerances exceed what conventional e-beam evaporation can reliably achieve [1, 7].
4.4AR Coating Specifications
An AR coating specification typically includes [7, 8]: wavelength range, R_avg (average reflectance across the band), R_max (maximum reflectance at any single wavelength), angle of incidence, polarization, and substrate material.
When comparing AR coatings between vendors, the distinction between R_avg and R_max is critical. A coating with R_avg < 0.5% might have individual wavelengths where R exceeds 1%, while another coating with R_max < 0.5% guarantees that no wavelength exceeds that threshold [7, 8].
▸5High-Reflection (HR) Coatings
5.1Dielectric Quarter-Wave Stacks
A dielectric high-reflector is built from alternating quarter-wave layers of high-index (n_H) and low-index (n_L) materials. At the design wavelength, each interface contributes a reflected wave that interferes constructively, producing a reflectance that increases with the number of layer pairs [1, 4]:
Where N = number of high/low layer pairs, n_H and n_L = high and low refractive indices, n₀ = incident medium index, and n_s = substrate index.
Problem: Calculate the reflectance of a TiO₂/SiO₂ quarter-wave stack with N = 10 layer pairs on BK7 at 1064 nm. n_H = 2.28, n_L = 1.45, n_s = 1.507, n₀ = 1.000.
Step 1 — Index ratio:
Step 2 — Ratio raised to 2N = 20:
1.572¹⁶ = 1395.6, 1.572²⁰ = 1395.6 × 6.112 = 8530
Step 3 — Reflectance:
Ten TiO₂/SiO₂ layer pairs achieve reflectance exceeding 99.9%. Each additional pair pushes reflectance closer to unity. With 15 pairs, R exceeds 99.999%.
The spectral bandwidth of the high-reflectance zone is approximately [1]:
For TiO₂/SiO₂, this gives Δλ/λ₀ ≈ 28%, meaning a stack designed for 1064 nm has a high-reflectance band roughly 300 nm wide [1].
5.2Enhanced Metallic Mirrors
Metallic mirrors — thin films of aluminum, silver, or gold — provide broadband reflectance without the bandwidth limitations of dielectric stacks. However, metals absorb a few percent of incident light, limiting their peak reflectance [1, 3].
| Metal | Protection | Reflectance | Usable Range (nm) | Strengths | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aluminum | SiO₂ overcoat | 87–92% | 200–10,000 | Broadest range, UV capability | Lower peak R |
| Aluminum | Enhanced dielectric | 95–98% | 400–700 | Higher R in visible | Narrower band |
| Silver | Dielectric overcoat | 97–99% | 450–2,000 | Highest broadband R | Tarnishes, no UV |
| Gold | Cr adhesion + overcoat | 96–99% | 700–20,000 | Excellent in IR | Poor below 600 nm |
5.3HR Specification and Performance
HR coating specifications include center wavelength, reflectance (e.g., R > 99.9%), bandwidth, angle of incidence, polarization, and damage threshold. Dielectric HR coatings blueshift at oblique incidence [1]:
Where n_eff is the effective index of the coating stack, typically 1.5–1.8. A 45° incidence angle produces a blueshift of approximately 3–5% [1].
▸6Partial Reflectors and Beam Splitter Coatings
6.1Dielectric Partial Reflectors
A partial reflector transmits a designed fraction of light and reflects the remainder. Common ratios include 50/50 (for interferometers), 70/30, 80/20, and 90/10 (for laser output couplers). The R/T ratio of a quarter-wave stack can be tuned by adjusting the number of layer pairs [1, 7].
For precise R/T control, non-quarter-wave layer designs are used. These allow continuous tuning of the reflectance to any desired value but produce narrower operating bandwidths than quarter-wave designs [1].
6.2Dichroic Coatings
Dichroic coatings are designed to reflect one wavelength range while transmitting another — functioning as wavelength-selective beam splitters. A longpass dichroic reflects short wavelengths and transmits long wavelengths; a shortpass dichroic does the opposite. Modern IBS-deposited dichroics achieve transition widths of less than 2% of the center wavelength [1, 7].
Applications include fluorescence microscopy, laser harmonic separation, and RGB color separation in projection systems [1, 7].
6.3Polarizing Beam Splitter Coatings
Thin-film polarizing beam splitter (PBS) coatings exploit the difference between s- and p-polarization reflectance at oblique incidence. Well-designed thin-film PBS coatings achieve extinction ratios of 100:1 to 1000:1 (20–30 dB) over bandwidths of 20–50 nm [1, 3].
The performance of PBS coatings is sensitive to angle of incidence — deviations of even 1–2° can significantly degrade the extinction ratio. For applications requiring higher extinction (>10,000:1), birefringent crystal polarizers are preferred [1, 3].
▸7Filter Coatings
7.1Edge Filters (Long-Pass and Short-Pass)
Edge filters provide a sharp spectral boundary: high transmittance on one side and high reflectance (or high optical density) on the other. Modern edge filter designs suppress ripple through systematic thickness adjustments to the outermost layers or by combining multiple quarter-wave stacks with overlapping bands [1, 7].
Edge steepness — the spectral distance between the 50% transmission point and the point where optical density reaches a specified level (e.g., OD 4) — is a key performance metric. High-performance IBS-deposited edge filters achieve transitions of less than 1% of the edge wavelength [1, 7].
7.2Bandpass Filters
A bandpass filter transmits a narrow spectral window and blocks wavelengths on both sides. The fundamental structure is a Fabry-Pérot cavity: two reflective stacks separated by a spacer layer whose optical thickness determines the transmission wavelength [1, 4].
Where = finesse and = reflectance of each mirror stack. The FWHM is related to the free spectral range and finesse by [1, 4]:
Where λ₀ = center wavelength and m = order of the spacer (m = 1 for a half-wave spacer).
Problem: A single-cavity bandpass filter centered at 550 nm uses a first-order half-wave spacer (m = 1) between two mirror stacks, each with R = 95%. Calculate the finesse and FWHM.
Step 1 — Finesse:
Step 2 — FWHM:
Mirror stacks with 95% reflectance produce a bandpass filter with approximately 9 nm FWHM at 550 nm. Increasing mirror reflectance to 99% would narrow the FWHM to about 1.7 nm.
7.3Notch Filters
Notch filters (band-rejection filters) block a narrow spectral band while transmitting the surrounding wavelengths. High-performance laser-line notch filters for Raman spectroscopy achieve OD > 6 (blocking > 99.9999%) within 1–2 nm of the laser line while maintaining > 90% transmittance just a few nanometers away [7].
▸8Coating Materials and Deposition Methods
8.1Common Coating Materials
The refractive index of a coating material determines its role in a multilayer design: high-index layers provide strong interference, while low-index layers provide the necessary index contrast [1]:
| Material | Formula | n (550 nm) | Usable Range (nm) | Role | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magnesium fluoride | MgF₂ | 1.38 | 120–8,000 | Low index | Standard single-layer AR, hard, durable |
| Silicon dioxide | SiO₂ | 1.46 | 180–8,000 | Low index | Most common low-index multilayer material |
| Calcium fluoride | CaF₂ | 1.43 | 130–10,000 | Low index | UV and IR applications |
| Aluminum oxide | Al₂O₃ | 1.63 | 200–7,000 | Medium index | Hard, protective overcoats |
| Hafnium dioxide | HfO₂ | 1.97 | 220–12,000 | High index | High LIDT, preferred for UV |
| Tantalum pentoxide | Ta₂O₅ | 2.10 | 300–10,000 | High index | Low absorption, good for NIR HR |
| Titanium dioxide | TiO₂ | 2.28 | 350–5,000 | High index | Highest common visible-range index |
| Zirconium dioxide | ZrO₂ | 2.05 | 300–8,000 | High index | Alternative to Ta₂O₅ |
| Zinc sulfide | ZnS | 2.35 | 400–14,000 | High index | IR applications |
| Silicon | Si | 3.45 | 1,200–8,000 | High index | IR multilayer stacks |
| Germanium | Ge | 4.00 | 1,800–17,000 | High index | Far-IR coatings |
8.2Electron-Beam Evaporation
Electron-beam (e-beam) evaporation is the most established coating deposition method. A focused electron beam heats a crucible containing the coating material until it evaporates, and the vapor condenses on substrates in a vacuum chamber [1, 9].
Conventional e-beam coatings have a columnar microstructure with voids that absorb atmospheric moisture, causing spectral drift of 1–2% of the design wavelength. E-beam coatings are classified as “soft” coatings. Despite limitations, e-beam evaporation remains widely used because of its high throughput, wide material selection, and low cost [9].
8.3Ion-Assisted Deposition (IAD)
Ion-assisted deposition improves on e-beam evaporation by directing an ion beam (typically argon) at the substrate during deposition, compacting the growing film and eliminating much of the columnar porosity. IAD coatings are “semi-hard” coatings with significantly reduced moisture shift, better durability, and improved adhesion [1, 9].
For most commercial applications, IAD has largely replaced conventional e-beam for precision multilayer coatings [1, 9].
8.4Ion Beam Sputtering (IBS)
Ion beam sputtering produces the highest-quality optical coatings available. An energetic ion beam bombards a target, ejecting atoms that deposit onto the substrate with significant kinetic energy, forming extremely dense, amorphous films with bulk-like refractive indices [1, 9].
IBS “hard” coatings have near-zero porosity, sub-angstrom surface roughness, very low absorption (< 1 ppm), highest available LIDT, and exceptional reproducibility. The disadvantages are low deposition rate (~10× slower than e-beam), limited substrate size, and high cost. IBS is reserved for laser cavity mirrors, telecom filters, and precision dichroics [1, 9].
8.5Magnetron Sputtering and APS
Magnetron sputtering uses a magnetically confined plasma to sputter coating materials and is widely used for large-area industrial coatings. Plasma-assisted reactive magnetron sputtering (PARMS) achieves quality approaching IBS at higher throughput [1, 9].
| Property | E-beam | IAD | IBS | Magnetron/PARMS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Film density | ~90–95% of bulk | ~95–99% | ~100% | ~98–100% |
| Moisture shift | 1–2% | 0.1–0.5% | < 0.05% | < 0.1% |
| Surface roughness | 5–15 Å RMS | 3–8 Å RMS | < 2 Å RMS | 2–5 Å RMS |
| Absorption loss | 10–100 ppm | 5–50 ppm | < 1–5 ppm | 2–10 ppm |
| LIDT (relative) | 1× (baseline) | 1.5–2× | 2–5× | 1.5–3× |
| Deposition rate | Fast | Moderate | Slow | Moderate–fast |
| Max substrate size | Very large | Large | Small–medium | Very large |
| Relative cost | Low | Medium | High | Medium–high |
| Coating class | Soft | Semi-hard | Hard | Hard |
▸9Coating Performance and Specifications
9.1Key Performance Metrics
The optical performance of a coating is described by four quantities that must sum to unity at each wavelength [1]:
Where R = reflectance, T = transmittance, A = absorptance, and S = scatter. For high-quality dielectric coatings, A and S are typically < 0.1%. The loss (A + S) determines the ceiling on performance: an HR coating with 0.05% total loss cannot exceed R = 99.95% [1].
Optical density (OD) specifies blocking performance of filters [1]:
OD 4 corresponds to T = 0.01%, and OD 6 corresponds to T = 0.0001% [1, 7].
9.2Laser-Induced Damage Threshold (LIDT)
The LIDT is the maximum power or energy density a coating can withstand without permanent damage, defined by ISO 21254. For CW lasers, LIDT is specified as power density (W/cm²). For pulsed lasers in the nanosecond regime, LIDT is specified as fluence (J/cm²) [7, 8, 10].
LIDT values can be approximately scaled to different conditions using [7, 8]:
This scaling is approximate and valid only within the nanosecond/microsecond regime. It should not be applied to sub-nanosecond pulses [7, 8].
Problem: A mirror has a tested LIDT of 10 J/cm² at 1064 nm, 10 ns pulse duration. Estimate the LIDT at 532 nm, 5 ns pulse duration.
Step 1 — Wavelength scaling:
Step 2 — Pulse duration scaling:
Step 3 — Combined:
LIDT₂ ≈ 3.5 J/cm²
Both the shorter wavelength and shorter pulse duration reduce the damage threshold. Always apply a safety margin of 2–3× below the scaled LIDT.
9.3Environmental and Mechanical Durability
Military and aerospace specifications (MIL-PRF-13830B) define standardized tests: adhesion (tape pull), humidity (24–48 hours at 49°C, 95% RH), abrasion, temperature cycling (−62°C to +71°C), and salt fog. IBS and PARMS coatings routinely pass all tests. IAD coatings pass most but may show small spectral shifts after extended humidity exposure. Conventional e-beam coatings are most susceptible to environmental degradation [1, 9, 10].
9.4Spectral Shift with Angle
All interference coatings blueshift as the angle of incidence increases. A coating designed for 0° incidence will shift approximately 1–2% at 30° and 3–5% at 45°. Coatings designed for oblique use must compensate by targeting a longer design wavelength at 0°. Coatings in converging beams experience a range of angles simultaneously, broadening and shifting the spectral response [1, 3].
▸10Coating Selection Workflow
10.1Define the Application Requirements
Every coating selection begins with: wavelength(s), angle of incidence, polarization, power/energy level (determining LIDT requirements), environment, and substrate material [1, 7, 8].
10.2Select the Coating Type
| Function | Coating Type | Typical Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Reduce reflection (one line) | V-coat AR | R < 0.25% at design λ |
| Reduce reflection (broadband) | BBAR | R_avg < 0.5% over range |
| Reduce reflection (multiple lines) | Dual/multi-band AR | R < 0.5% at each λ |
| Maximum reflectance (laser mirror) | Dielectric HR | R > 99.5–99.99% |
| Broadband reflectance | Enhanced metallic | R > 95% over octave+ |
| Divide beam by intensity | Partial reflector | R/T to spec (e.g., 50/50) |
| Divide beam by wavelength | Dichroic | T > 95%, R > 95% per band |
| Divide beam by polarization | PBS coating | Extinction 100:1–1000:1 |
| Transmit narrow band | Bandpass filter | FWHM 0.5–50 nm |
| Block narrow band | Notch filter | OD > 4–6 at center |
| Transmit above cutoff | Longpass edge filter | T > 95%, OD > 4 blocking |
| Transmit below cutoff | Shortpass edge filter | T > 95%, OD > 4 blocking |
10.3Choose the Deposition Method
| Application | Recommended Method | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| High-power laser mirrors | IBS | Highest LIDT, lowest loss |
| Precision telecom filters | IBS or PARMS | Layer thickness precision, stability |
| General-purpose lab optics | IAD | Good performance at reasonable cost |
| Large-area architectural | Magnetron sputtering | Scalability, throughput |
| Cost-sensitive or prototype | E-beam | Lowest cost, fastest turnaround |
| UV coatings (< 300 nm) | IBS or IAD with HfO₂/SiO₂ | Material compatibility, low absorption |
| Mid-IR coatings | E-beam or IAD | Wide material selection for IR |
10.4Verify and Communicate Specifications
A complete coating specification for procurement should include: coating type and function, substrate material and dimensions, wavelength range and center wavelength, reflectance/transmittance requirements (R_avg, R_max, T_min), angle of incidence and polarization, LIDT requirement (with wavelength and pulse duration), environmental requirements, and acceptable spectral shift tolerance [7, 8].
Common specification mistakes include omitting the angle of incidence, failing to specify polarization for oblique-incidence coatings, and specifying only R_avg without an R_max constraint [7, 8].
References
- [1]H. A. Macleod, Thin-Film Optical Filters, 5th ed. CRC Press, 2017.
- [2]E. Hecht, Optics, 5th ed. Pearson, 2017.
- [3]R. E. Fischer, B. Tadic-Galeb, and P. R. Yoder, Optical System Design, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, 2008.
- [4]O. S. Heavens, Optical Properties of Thin Solid Films. Dover, 1991.
- [5]F. L. Pedrotti, L. M. Pedrotti, and L. S. Pedrotti, Introduction to Optics, 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press, 2017.
- [6]S. Larouche and L. Martinu, “OpenFilters: open-source software for the design, optimization, and synthesis of optical filters,” Appl. Opt. 47, C219–C230, 2008.
- [7]Thorlabs, Inc., “Optical Coatings Technical Reference,” thorlabs.com.
- [8]Edmund Optics, “Understanding Optical Specifications: Coatings,” edmundoptics.com.
- [9]CVI Laser Optics (IDEX Optics & Photonics), Optical Coating and Materials Technical Guide.
- [10]MIL-PRF-13830B, “Optical Components for Fire Control Instruments,” U.S. Department of Defense.